Talk:Outsider art

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Outsider art article.
This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Article policies

Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Archives: 1: 3 months

Visual arts

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts articles

Folklore Low‑importance

	This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Folklore, a WikiProject dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of the topics of folklore and folklore studies. If you would like to participate, you may edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project's page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to discussion.FolkloreWikipedia:WikiProject FolkloreTemplate:WikiProject FolkloreFolklore articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This article has been viewed enough times in a single week to appear in the Top 25 Report. The week in which this happened:

July 9 to 15, 2017 (18th)

Splitting hairs -- Art Brut vs outsider art

Art Brut -- as a term came first and was coined by Jean Dubuffet and is centered mainly on child-like naive, primitive works where as ...

Outsider Art -- is ANY art that is created by someone untrained outside of the traditional art world. Slacker13 (talk) 15:23, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed with the Teahouse talk. Art brut, (French: “raw art”) really deserves its own page, not nestled here. There was even a Companie de L’Art Brut set up to collect and study Art Brut, which is now housed in the museum, La Collection de l’Art Brut in Lausanne, Switzerland. Avignonesi (talk) 16:47, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the agreement! Slacker13 (talk) 03:32, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to see evidence from art historians that these are really two discrete topics rather than French and English terms for essentially the same topic. Cullen328 (talk) 19:14, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I found it in this book: https://books.google.com/books?hl=en&lr=&id=uajFzNpyJC8C&oi=fnd&pg=PP1&dq=art+brut+vs+outsider+art&ots=1BpFce9Fa0&sig=_uFofq9I9BATWiugqiZq9_zrvc0#v=onepage&q=art%20brut%20vs%20outsider%20art&f=false. Pulling some excerpts....

and this paper: https://scholarscompass.vcu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1313&context=jstae

Related, often inter-changed -- but actually two distinct terms. Slacker13 (talk) 18:48, 25 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

One of the references in this article is linking to a 404 page.

Particularly "Prinz, Jesse. "Against outsider art." Journal of Social Philosophy 48.3 (2017): 250-272.[1]".

Is there anything that can be done about it? I'd love to read up on it.

Thanks. EnviousBird (talk) 18:25, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Adding a section about criticism of the term

Many pages on Wikipedia have criticism sections. This page does not. But the term Outsider Art has been notably criticized many times. I am thinking of adding a section. What process should I go through to add one? Krɪt̮ɪkl feɪjəɹ (talk) 18:26, 20 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Krɪt̮ɪkl feɪjəɹ,

Be bold! --u9000 (they/them • talk) 15:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]